Traditions...when do they cross the line?
I came across this article about female circumcision in Africa. It kind of got me thinking about all the so-called traditions that women have had to go through in the past. Bound feet, circumcision, it all sounds super barbaric and painful. I think it’s worse when they use religion as an excuse. =_=
About 15 percent of those who undergo genital mutilation, mainly women in the Horn of Africa, suffer the most dangerous and extreme version, infibulation. Isnino Shuriye, who was also at the Nairobi meeting, performed infibulations among the Somali community in northern Kenya. She would cut off the clitoris and all the labia of 7-year-old girls. She would sew up the girls to be totally smooth, with a pencil eraser-sized opening for menses and urine. Each girl's legs were bound together for weeks so scars could form. Ms. Shuriye used no anesthetic.
All types of female circumcision have huge psychological and physical dangers. Some girls bleed to death during the operation, or die of tetanus or infection shortly after. But for infibulated women, the dangers are even greater. Many infibulated women suffer constant infections and other health problems because urine and blood back up. Their husbands must bring a knife to their wedding night to cut them open. Childbirth often is fatal for infibulated women and their babies, and their wounds make them much more vulnerable to the AIDS virus.
I wonder why women in the past went through with it. It’s just unimaginable for me. And the fact that things like that is still happening in the present is shocking to say the least. I was cringing in pain when I read the article... thank goodness I was not born in Africa! >_<
1 Comments:
At July 6, 2004 at 5:07 AM,
random said…
female genital mutilation gives islam a bad name...
same as all those funny laws which are actually jahiliah (pre islamic) pratices...
the number of "islamic traditions" which are actually notislamic is mind boggling. the problem is I think that the prophet lived a long time ago and the printing press was not invented, and so as time went on A lot practices which originated from arabia and other subsequent Islamic empires and civilisations were taught to be "Islamic". Records are always sketchy and traditions and principles are adapted and readapted to suit times, needs and political tastes. Malay history is rich in such deviations, that's why till today, total corrupt nincampoops such as the Malay Sultans are looked on as defenders of the faith. At one time they were even taught of as representatives of God on earth. (which is actually a big insult to God.)
I donno, I read somewhere that even the tudung is not essentially an Islamic practice in the time of Muhammad, it was popularised only during the time of the safavid empire.
My principle on traditions (and Islam in general) is actually very simple. If it hurts you, or somebody else, it's not an Islamic tradition. I may be presumptious but I don't believe God put us on earth to hurt other people.
PS: this does not mean I would not hurt other people, just that I won't do it in the name of Islam.
Post a Comment
<< Home